Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.22 seconds)Section 304A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 279 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 281 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 311 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Rathnashalvan vs State Of Karnataka on 11 January, 2007
30) The ambit of Section 304A IPC has also been succinctly explained
by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rathnashalvan v State of
Karnataka, AIR 2007 SC 1064 wherein it had observed that:
Section 82 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Mohammed Aynuddin @ Miyam vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 28 July, 2000
29) It is duly noted that a rash act is primarily an overhasty act. It is
opposed to a deliberate act. Still a rash act can be a deliberate act
FIR No. 504/05
PS Keshav Puram
U/s 279/304A IPC
State Vs Vipin & Anr. Page No. 14 of 20
in the sense that it was done without due care and caution.
Culpable rashness lies in running the risk of doing an act with
recklessness and with indifference as to the consequences.
Criminal negligence is the failure to exercise duty with reasonable
and proper care and precaution guarding against injury to the
public generally or to any individual in particular. It is the
imperative duty of the driver of a vehicle to adopt such reasonable
and proper care and precaution (Ref: Mohd. Aynuddin alias
Miyam v. State of A.P. (2000) 7 SCC 72).
Section 133 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
1