Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.57 seconds)Section 370 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 370A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 11 in The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Sahil Patel And Others vs The State Of A.P. Rep.By Its Public ... on 5 January, 2016
In Criminal Petition Nos.2572 of 2014 and batch, dt.05-01-2016 in
Sahil Patel and others vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Public
Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad, referring to the previous expressions, it
was held by this Court that no doubt, from the decisions supra, Sections 3
and 4 of the Act no way applicable so far as the customers concerned. If any
of them indulge in sexual enjoyment with the sex worker respectively and
for any of them keeping or allowing premises as brothel house or habitually
found in the company of sex workers or living on that earnings or detaining
any person to carry prostitution or such premises within the notified and
prohibited area it attracts any of Sections 3 to 11 of the Act besides
sections 370 and 370-A of IPC. The alleged occurrences were after the
Amendment by Act 13/2013 to the IPC and the Schedule of CrPC which
came into force with effect from 03.12.2013 incorporating Sections 370 and
370-A of IPC.
Mohan Lal vs The State Of Punjab on 16 August, 2018
10. However, the fact remains that, the detecting officer as
complainant of the crime and the person who registered the crime and
investigating is one and the same which is per se not sustainable as per the
latest constitution bench expression of the Apex Court in Mohan Lal Vs.
State of Punjab2.