Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.48 seconds)
Amritlal Nathubhai Shah And Others vs Union Government Of India And Another on 24 August, 1976
cites
Section 10 in The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
State Of Orissa, Through The Secretary, ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 16 April, 1971
or by a statutory corporation or for a company in a public
sector." The controversy in that case was. however, examined
with reference to the provisions of article 298 of the
Constitution. The two cases cited by Mr. Sen cannot thus be
of any avail to the appellants.
Article 298 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 17 in The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Article 162 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 4 in The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
S. Lal & Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs The Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 4 April, 1972
We have gone through the decisions in State of Orissa V.
Union' of India(1) and M/s S. Lal and Co. Ltd. v. The Union
of India and others(2), on which reliance has been placed by
Mr. Sen. In the former case the High Court of Orissa took
the view that reservation of a particular area for being
exploited in the public sector by the State could not be
said to be a purpose for which it could be reserved under
rule 59. In taking that view the High Court went by the
consideration that the subject of the legislation in the Act
became an "exclusive subject for legislation by Parliament"
1