Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.26 seconds)Electronics And Computer Software ... vs Central Information Commission ... on 12 February, 2020
8. The Commission, after adverting to the facts and circumstances of the
case, hearing both the parties and perusal of the records, observes that the
appellant sought information from the respondent organization. However, the
respondent submitted, that the question of applicability of the RTI Act to Export
Promotion Councils, is sub judice before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in
the case titled Electronics and Computer Software Export Promotion Council v.
Central Information Commission, Civil Appeal No. 54 of 2009, and connected
matters. The Commission finds, that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India had
granted stay in the aforesaid case vide order dated 05.01.2009 and the stay is
still operational. Also, the Commission heard similar matter in case no.
CIC/MOCMI/A/2020/134684, filed by the instant appellant. The Commission
also finds, that the adjudication of the instant appeal would be premature at this
stage. Hence, no relief can be granted. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Section 25 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
D.A.V. College Trust And Managing ... vs Director Of Public Instructions on 17 September, 2019
12. The Hon'ble Supreme Court, in D.A.V. College Trust and
Management Society v. Director of Public Instructions, AIR 2019 SC
4411, has clarified that there is no rigid numerical or percentage-
based formula such as a 50% threshold; instead, the question of
substantial financing must be determined on the facts of each case,
including whether the body can effectively function without
Government finance.
Article 12 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 25 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The Companies Act, 1956
Section 8 in The Companies Act, 2013 [Entire Act]
Mr.Ratan Mishra vs Ministry Of Commerce And Industry on 31 July, 2013
20. In earlier proceedings, this Hon'ble Commission itself took note
of the pendency of the aforesaid matter and the subsisting interim
position, and accordingly adjourned the case sine die. Likewise, in
Ratan Mishra v. Ministry of Commerce and Industry, in File No.
CIC/SS/A/2012/000996, it was specifically recorded that Export
Promotion Councils have consistently maintained that they are
Section 25 companies, not "State" under Article 12, and not public
authorities under Section 2(h), and that the issue is pending before
the Hon'ble Supreme Court."
1