Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (0.26 seconds)Section 91 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
The Electricity Act, 2003
State Of Haryana And Ors. Etc. Etc vs Piara Singh And Ors. Etc. Etc on 12 August, 1992
In other words, a
contractual employee can be replaced by a regular employee but where
the scheme of appointment itself suggests, the appointment to be made on
contractual basis, not on regular basis, the ratio of the Supreme Court in
Piara Singh's case as upheld in Uma Devi's case would not be
applicable. The judgment relied upon will not help the petitioner.
Abhinav Chaudhary & Ors. vs Delhi Technological University & Anr. on 20 January, 2015
Insofar as the judgment in Abhinav Chaturvedi (supra) is
concerned, there is no dispute that despite Rules in existence,
appointments were being made on contractual basis.
Dr. Parmod Kumar Dhailwal vs Gnct Of Delhi & Ors on 26 May, 2015
(x) Dr. Parmod Kumar Dhailwal vs. GNCT of Delhi & Ors. Writ
Petition No.7942/2014 and connected writ petitions decided on
May 26, 2015 by this Court.
Gostho Behari Sirkar vs Surs' Estates Ltd. on 12 May, 1960
(i) Gostho Behari Sirkar vs. Surs'Estates Ltd. AIR 1960 Calcutta 752;
Olga Tellis & Ors vs Bombay Municipal Corporation & Ors. Etc on 10 July, 1985
In view of the above, the reliance placed by the petitioner on the
judgments of Olga Tellis and others (supra), M/s Motilal Padampat
Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. (supra), A.C. Jose (supra), Delhi Cloth & General
Mills Ltd. (supra), Provash Chandra Dalui and another (supra), Dr.
Sida Nitinkumar Laxmankumar Laxmanbhai and anothers (supra),
Tapti Oil Industries and another (supra), Yousuf Ali Abdulla Fazalbhoy
and ors (supra), Chhaganlal Keshavlal Mehta (supra), Rameshwar
Prasad Sinha (supra), C.J. Thakor (supra), M/s. Phoneix Impex (supra)
and P. Dasa Muni Reddy (supra), would not help the petitioner.
M/S Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors on 12 December, 1978
In view of the above, the reliance placed by the petitioner on the
judgments of Olga Tellis and others (supra), M/s Motilal Padampat
Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. (supra), A.C. Jose (supra), Delhi Cloth & General
Mills Ltd. (supra), Provash Chandra Dalui and another (supra), Dr.
Sida Nitinkumar Laxmankumar Laxmanbhai and anothers (supra),
Tapti Oil Industries and another (supra), Yousuf Ali Abdulla Fazalbhoy
and ors (supra), Chhaganlal Keshavlal Mehta (supra), Rameshwar
Prasad Sinha (supra), C.J. Thakor (supra), M/s. Phoneix Impex (supra)
and P. Dasa Muni Reddy (supra), would not help the petitioner.
Provash Chandra Dalui & Anr vs Biswanath Banerjee & Anr on 3 April, 1989
In view of the above, the reliance placed by the petitioner on the
judgments of Olga Tellis and others (supra), M/s Motilal Padampat
Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. (supra), A.C. Jose (supra), Delhi Cloth & General
Mills Ltd. (supra), Provash Chandra Dalui and another (supra), Dr.
Sida Nitinkumar Laxmankumar Laxmanbhai and anothers (supra),
Tapti Oil Industries and another (supra), Yousuf Ali Abdulla Fazalbhoy
and ors (supra), Chhaganlal Keshavlal Mehta (supra), Rameshwar
Prasad Sinha (supra), C.J. Thakor (supra), M/s. Phoneix Impex (supra)
and P. Dasa Muni Reddy (supra), would not help the petitioner.