Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.34 seconds)
Sahil Goswami vs State Of H.P on 2 April, 2024 cites

Madan Lal And Anr vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 19 August, 2003

In Madan Lal and Another v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2003) 7 SCC 465 this Court held that ::: Downloaded on - 04/04/2024 20:32:24 :::CIS 26 "19. Whether there was conscious possession has to be determined with reference to the factual backdrop. The facts which can be culled out from the evidence on record are that all the accused persons were travelling in a vehicle and as noted by the trial court they were known to each other and it has not been .
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 645 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Supdt. & Remembrancer Of Legal Affairs ... vs Anil Kumar Bhunja & Ors on 23 August, 1979

22. The expression "possession" is a polymorphous term which assumes different colours in different contexts. It may carry different meanings in contextually different backgrounds. It is impossible, as was observed in Supdt. & Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, W.B. v. Anil Kumar Bhunja [(1979) 4 SCC 274 : 1979 SCC (Cri) 1038 : AIR 1980 SC 52] to work out a completely logical and precise definition of "possession" uniform[ly] applicable to all situations in the context of all statutes.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 673 - R S Sarkaria - Full Document
1   2 3 Next