Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (1.29 seconds)
Gujarat University vs N.U. Rajguru And Ors on 10 November, 1987 cites

Ramjibhai Ukabhai Parmar vs Manilal Purushottam Solanki And Anr. on 20 July, 1960

19. In that case the High Court interpreted Section 58 of the Gujarat University Act as it existed prior to its amendment in 1983. The High Court held that since a dispute could not be referred to the State Government unless it was raised by 20 members of the Court, alternative remedy could not be available to an aggrieved person. Section 58 was substituted by the Gujarat Act 9 of 1983 which came into force with effect from 25.1.1983. Under the amended Section a dispute raised by an aggrieved person relating to election of a member to an authority of the University shall be referred to the Government for adjudication. Now it is not necessary that the dispute should be referred to the State Government only when 20 members of the Court so require. On the other hand, reference shall be made to the State Government even if a dispute is raised by a single individual provided such dispute relates to a matter specified in Section 58(2) of the Act. The decision in Ramjibhai Ukabhai Parmar's case does not apply in view of the amendment of Section 58.
Gujarat High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1