Amarjit Singh vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 8 January, 2002
5. I have heard learned advocates appearing on
behalf of the respective parties and considered the ratio laid
down by the Apex Court in case of Amarjit Singh v. State of
NCT of Delhi reported in JT 2002 (1) SC 291 and in the
case of Sandeep Jain v. National Capital Territory of
Delhi Rep. By Secretary, Home Deptt., reported in (2000)
2 SCC 66 as well as in the case of Jani Yoginiben
Kumarbhai and others v. State of Gujarat vide order
dated 12.02.2013 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc.
Application No.2400 of 2013. I am of the opinion that the
present application requires consideration and the same is
allowed. Condition No.9 imposed by 6th (Ad-hoc) Additional
Page 3 of 4
HC-NIC Page 3 of 4 Created On Sat Feb 06 02:45:08 IST 2016
R/CR.MA/1602/2016 ORDER
Sessions Judge, Ankleshwar, District-Bharuch vide order
dated 18.01.2016 in Criminal Misc.Application No.9 of 2016 is
hereby deleted. However, the applicant No.1 shall deposit an
amount of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand only)
25,000/- each with local surety as well as applicant No.2
shall deposit an amount of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty
Five Thousand only) with local surety within a period of 10
days from today. Rest of the conditions imposed by the Trial
Court shall remain as it is. Rule is made absolute to the
aforesaid extent.