Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.21 seconds)
S R Das vs D/O Post on 13 May, 2020 cites

Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs R. Reddappa And Anr. on 5 August, 1993

In the case of R. Reddappa (supra) cited by the applicant, the dispute related to punishment orders of dismissal from service were passed without conducting any enquiry. The Tribunal's orders were challenged before Hon'ble Apex Court. The observations made in the order about arbitrariness, were made with regard to the orders passed by the authorities in disciplinary proceedings in the cited case. In the present OA, it cannot be said that the order of the respondents has been arbitrary in view of the contentions of the respondents that their action is in accordance with the rule 15 of the Appendix-37 of the Postal Manual.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 68 - R M Sahai - Full Document

H.P.Public Service Commission vs Mukesh Thakur & Anr on 25 May, 2010

3. It is clear that the said clause does not permit re-evaluation of the answer scripts in any case or under any circumstances. This clause/rule has to be read in the backdrop of the Supreme Court's decision in the case of H.P. Public Service Commission vs. Mukesh Thakur, (2010) 6 SCC 759, wherein the Supreme Court after considering its earlier decisions in the case of Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education & Anr vs. Paritosh Bhupesh Kumarsheth, AIR 1984 SC 1543, and Pramod Kumar Srivastava vs. Chairman Bihar 8 Public Service Commission, Patna & Ors, AIR 2004 SC 4116, held as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 842 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

Maharashtra State Board Of Secondary ... vs Paritosh Bhupesh Kumar Sheth Etc on 17 July, 1984

3. It is clear that the said clause does not permit re-evaluation of the answer scripts in any case or under any circumstances. This clause/rule has to be read in the backdrop of the Supreme Court's decision in the case of H.P. Public Service Commission vs. Mukesh Thakur, (2010) 6 SCC 759, wherein the Supreme Court after considering its earlier decisions in the case of Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education & Anr vs. Paritosh Bhupesh Kumarsheth, AIR 1984 SC 1543, and Pramod Kumar Srivastava vs. Chairman Bihar 8 Public Service Commission, Patna & Ors, AIR 2004 SC 4116, held as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 990 - V B Eradi - Full Document

Pramod Kumar Srivastava vs Chairman, Bihar Public Service ... on 6 August, 2004

3. It is clear that the said clause does not permit re-evaluation of the answer scripts in any case or under any circumstances. This clause/rule has to be read in the backdrop of the Supreme Court's decision in the case of H.P. Public Service Commission vs. Mukesh Thakur, (2010) 6 SCC 759, wherein the Supreme Court after considering its earlier decisions in the case of Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education & Anr vs. Paritosh Bhupesh Kumarsheth, AIR 1984 SC 1543, and Pramod Kumar Srivastava vs. Chairman Bihar 8 Public Service Commission, Patna & Ors, AIR 2004 SC 4116, held as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 410 - G P Mathur - Full Document

Dr. Muneeb Ul Rehman Haroon And Ors vs Government Of Jammu And Kashmir State ... on 13 August, 1984

"26. A similar view has been reiterated in Dr. Muneeb Ul Rehman Haroon & Ors. Vs. Government of Jammu & Kashmir State & Ors. AIR 1984 SC 1585; Board of Secondary Education Vs. Pravas Ranjan Panda & Anr. (2004) 13 SCC 383; President, Board of Secondary Education, Orissa & Anr. Vs. D. Suvankar & Anr. (2007) 1 SCC 603; The Secretary, West Bengal Council of Higher Secondary Education vs. Ayan Das & Ors AIR 2007 SC 3098; and Sahiti & Ors. Vs. Chancellor, Dr. N.T.R. University of Health Sciences & Ors. (2009) 1 SCC 599.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 107 - Y V Chandrachud - Full Document

The President Board Of Secondary ... vs D. Suvankar & Anr on 14 November, 2006

"26. A similar view has been reiterated in Dr. Muneeb Ul Rehman Haroon & Ors. Vs. Government of Jammu & Kashmir State & Ors. AIR 1984 SC 1585; Board of Secondary Education Vs. Pravas Ranjan Panda & Anr. (2004) 13 SCC 383; President, Board of Secondary Education, Orissa & Anr. Vs. D. Suvankar & Anr. (2007) 1 SCC 603; The Secretary, West Bengal Council of Higher Secondary Education vs. Ayan Das & Ors AIR 2007 SC 3098; and Sahiti & Ors. Vs. Chancellor, Dr. N.T.R. University of Health Sciences & Ors. (2009) 1 SCC 599.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 201 - A Pasayat - Full Document

The Secretary, West Bengal Council Of ... vs Ayan Das & Ors on 28 September, 2007

"26. A similar view has been reiterated in Dr. Muneeb Ul Rehman Haroon & Ors. Vs. Government of Jammu & Kashmir State & Ors. AIR 1984 SC 1585; Board of Secondary Education Vs. Pravas Ranjan Panda & Anr. (2004) 13 SCC 383; President, Board of Secondary Education, Orissa & Anr. Vs. D. Suvankar & Anr. (2007) 1 SCC 603; The Secretary, West Bengal Council of Higher Secondary Education vs. Ayan Das & Ors AIR 2007 SC 3098; and Sahiti & Ors. Vs. Chancellor, Dr. N.T.R. University of Health Sciences & Ors. (2009) 1 SCC 599.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 228 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Sahiti & Ors vs Chancellor,Ntr.Univ.Of Health Sc.& ... on 22 October, 2008

"26. A similar view has been reiterated in Dr. Muneeb Ul Rehman Haroon & Ors. Vs. Government of Jammu & Kashmir State & Ors. AIR 1984 SC 1585; Board of Secondary Education Vs. Pravas Ranjan Panda & Anr. (2004) 13 SCC 383; President, Board of Secondary Education, Orissa & Anr. Vs. D. Suvankar & Anr. (2007) 1 SCC 603; The Secretary, West Bengal Council of Higher Secondary Education vs. Ayan Das & Ors AIR 2007 SC 3098; and Sahiti & Ors. Vs. Chancellor, Dr. N.T.R. University of Health Sciences & Ors. (2009) 1 SCC 599.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 197 - J M Panchal - Full Document
1   2 Next