Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.21 seconds)
K.K. Bhardwaj vs Union Of India on 21 November, 2014 cites

K.M.Mishra vs Central Bank Of India & Ors on 16 September, 2008

In view of the conspectus of the above case law, it is clear and unambiguous that every entry in an ACR of a public servant whether he is in Civil, Judicial or Police or any other service (other than Armed Forces), whether it is an adverse remark or a below benchmark remark, i.e. poor, fair, average, good or very good, must be communicated to a public servant by recording reasons for such remark, within a reasonable period. Any non-compliance of the same amounts to arbitrariness and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, besides against the purpose and object of the ACR Scheme itself.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 78 - A Alam - Full Document

Ekta Shakti Foundation vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 17 July, 2006

In Ekta Shakti Foundation (supra), the Honble Apex Court, while dealing with the legality of certain terms in inviting offers for implementation of the scheme called the "Detailed Scheme for Capacity Building of Self Help Groups to Prepare and Supply Supplementary Nutrition under the Integrated Child Development Service (in short the 'ICDS') Programme held that:
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 276 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Dev Dutt vs Union Of India & Ors on 12 May, 2008

In Dev Dutt Vs. Union of India, 2008 (8) SCC 725 and in Abhijit Ghosh Dastidar Vs. Union of India, 2009 (16) SCC 146, the Honble Apex Court held that Non-communication of not only adverse remarks but also below benchmark remarks, such as 'good' would be arbitrary and as such violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and warrant exclusion of such ACRs from consideration.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 1116 - M Katju - Full Document
1   2 Next