Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.24 seconds)Parisons Agrotech (P) Ltd. & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 21 August, 2015
48. This Court, therefore, is of the view that the question of interference of
the High Court under the power of judicial review so far as it relates to
the policy decision of the State Government is concerned, the same is
fit to be judicially reviewed if the same is based upon the arbitrary
exercise of power and is having no justifiable reason therein. The fact
of the present case is exactly the same and as such, this Court
exercising the power of judicial review as per the law laid down by the
Hon'ble Apex Court in Federation of Railway Officers Association
and Ors. vs. Union of India (supra); Directorate of Film Festivals and
Ors. vs. Gaurav Ashwin Jain and Ors. (supra); Ugar Sugar Works
Ltd. Vs. Delhi Administration and Ors. (supra); Parisons Agrotech
Private Limited and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors. (supra); Jacob
Puliyel vs Union of India and Others (supra) and; Union of India and
Others vs. Bharat Forge Ltd. and Another (supra), is of the view that
the impugned order requires interference.
Jacob Puliyel vs Union Of India & Ors. on 14 October, 2015
48. This Court, therefore, is of the view that the question of interference of
the High Court under the power of judicial review so far as it relates to
the policy decision of the State Government is concerned, the same is
fit to be judicially reviewed if the same is based upon the arbitrary
exercise of power and is having no justifiable reason therein. The fact
of the present case is exactly the same and as such, this Court
exercising the power of judicial review as per the law laid down by the
Hon'ble Apex Court in Federation of Railway Officers Association
and Ors. vs. Union of India (supra); Directorate of Film Festivals and
Ors. vs. Gaurav Ashwin Jain and Ors. (supra); Ugar Sugar Works
Ltd. Vs. Delhi Administration and Ors. (supra); Parisons Agrotech
Private Limited and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors. (supra); Jacob
Puliyel vs Union of India and Others (supra) and; Union of India and
Others vs. Bharat Forge Ltd. and Another (supra), is of the view that
the impugned order requires interference.
Ugar Sugar Works Ltd vs Delhi Administration And Ors on 22 March, 2001
48. This Court, therefore, is of the view that the question of interference of
the High Court under the power of judicial review so far as it relates to
the policy decision of the State Government is concerned, the same is
fit to be judicially reviewed if the same is based upon the arbitrary
exercise of power and is having no justifiable reason therein. The fact
of the present case is exactly the same and as such, this Court
exercising the power of judicial review as per the law laid down by the
Hon'ble Apex Court in Federation of Railway Officers Association
and Ors. vs. Union of India (supra); Directorate of Film Festivals and
Ors. vs. Gaurav Ashwin Jain and Ors. (supra); Ugar Sugar Works
Ltd. Vs. Delhi Administration and Ors. (supra); Parisons Agrotech
Private Limited and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors. (supra); Jacob
Puliyel vs Union of India and Others (supra) and; Union of India and
Others vs. Bharat Forge Ltd. and Another (supra), is of the view that
the impugned order requires interference.
Federation Of Railway Officers ... vs Union Of India on 13 March, 2003
48. This Court, therefore, is of the view that the question of interference of
the High Court under the power of judicial review so far as it relates to
the policy decision of the State Government is concerned, the same is
fit to be judicially reviewed if the same is based upon the arbitrary
exercise of power and is having no justifiable reason therein. The fact
of the present case is exactly the same and as such, this Court
exercising the power of judicial review as per the law laid down by the
Hon'ble Apex Court in Federation of Railway Officers Association
and Ors. vs. Union of India (supra); Directorate of Film Festivals and
Ors. vs. Gaurav Ashwin Jain and Ors. (supra); Ugar Sugar Works
Ltd. Vs. Delhi Administration and Ors. (supra); Parisons Agrotech
Private Limited and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors. (supra); Jacob
Puliyel vs Union of India and Others (supra) and; Union of India and
Others vs. Bharat Forge Ltd. and Another (supra), is of the view that
the impugned order requires interference.
Directorate Of Film Festivals & Ors vs Gaurav Ashwin Jain & Ors on 11 April, 2007
48. This Court, therefore, is of the view that the question of interference of
the High Court under the power of judicial review so far as it relates to
the policy decision of the State Government is concerned, the same is
fit to be judicially reviewed if the same is based upon the arbitrary
exercise of power and is having no justifiable reason therein. The fact
of the present case is exactly the same and as such, this Court
exercising the power of judicial review as per the law laid down by the
Hon'ble Apex Court in Federation of Railway Officers Association
and Ors. vs. Union of India (supra); Directorate of Film Festivals and
Ors. vs. Gaurav Ashwin Jain and Ors. (supra); Ugar Sugar Works
Ltd. Vs. Delhi Administration and Ors. (supra); Parisons Agrotech
Private Limited and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors. (supra); Jacob
Puliyel vs Union of India and Others (supra) and; Union of India and
Others vs. Bharat Forge Ltd. and Another (supra), is of the view that
the impugned order requires interference.
Union Of India vs Bharat Forge Limited on 16 August, 2022
48. This Court, therefore, is of the view that the question of interference of
the High Court under the power of judicial review so far as it relates to
the policy decision of the State Government is concerned, the same is
fit to be judicially reviewed if the same is based upon the arbitrary
exercise of power and is having no justifiable reason therein. The fact
of the present case is exactly the same and as such, this Court
exercising the power of judicial review as per the law laid down by the
Hon'ble Apex Court in Federation of Railway Officers Association
and Ors. vs. Union of India (supra); Directorate of Film Festivals and
Ors. vs. Gaurav Ashwin Jain and Ors. (supra); Ugar Sugar Works
Ltd. Vs. Delhi Administration and Ors. (supra); Parisons Agrotech
Private Limited and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors. (supra); Jacob
Puliyel vs Union of India and Others (supra) and; Union of India and
Others vs. Bharat Forge Ltd. and Another (supra), is of the view that
the impugned order requires interference.
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Census Commissioner & Ors vs R.Krishamurthy on 7 November, 2014
19. The aforesaid decision is required to be considered by this Court as to
whether the decision can be said to be proper and whether the said
decision has caused serious prejudice to the interest of the writ
petitioners.
Mrs. Maneka Gandhi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 25 January, 1978
34. Thus, the law is also settled when the right has been accrued, the same
can only be recalled by providing an opportunity of hearing otherwise
the person concerned who is to face the civil consequence will have the
result without providing an opportunity of hearing. Reference in this
regard be made to the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in
Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India and Anr., (1978) 1 SCC 248.
Relevant paragraph, i.e., paragraph-184 of the said judgment is being
referred as under: