Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.40 seconds)Mon Mohun Sirkar And Ors. vs The Secretary Of State For India In ... on 6 June, 1890
With all deference, I am unable to agree with the view which the learned Judges who decided that case took of the question before us. That view is opposed to the ruling of the Calcutta High Court in Mon Mohun Sirkar v. The Secretary of State for India in Council (1890) I.L.R. 17 Cal.
Ramabhadra And Anr. vs Jagannatha on 7 October, 1890
It was held to be so even by the Madras High Court in Ramabhadra v. Jagannatha (1890) I.L.R. 14 Mad., 328, which the learned Chief Justice has criticized. As that section only vests the Court with a discretion and there was no obligation on the Court to make a decree for mesne profits for the period subsequent to the date of the suit for possession, the omission to grant such mesne profits cannot by virtue of Explanation III to Section 13 preclude a subsequent suit for mesne profits.
Jiban Das Oswal And Anr. vs Durga Pershad Adhikari And Ors. on 7 August, 1893
968, which was approved by the same Court in Jiban Das Oswal v. Durqa Pershad Adhikan (1893) I.L.R. 21 Cal.
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
1