Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.46 seconds)

Centrlal Board Of Sec.Education & Anr vs Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors on 9 August, 2011

"Needless to state that as observed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in paragraph No. 14 in the case of CBSE and Another (supra), Public Authorities are under an obligation to maintain records and disseminate the information in the manner provided under Section 4 of the RTI act. The submission of the petitioner that it is an onerous task to supply documents, therefore is required to be rejected. The Law mandates preserving of documents, supplying copies thereof to the applicant, in our view, cannot be said to be an onerous task."
Supreme Court of India Cites 36 - Cited by 8906 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

Mrgopal Prasad vs Ministry Of Urban Development on 24 April, 2014

Attention of the Respondent was also drawn towards the decision of the Commission in Appeal No.CIC/DOURD/A/2017/148703-BJ dated 07.03.2019 in the case of Mr. Gopal Prasad Vs. CPIO, Dy. Land & Development Officer, Ministry of Urban Development and in Appeal No. CIC/DDATY/A/2017/156714-BJ dated 18.02.2019 in the case of Mr. Nitin Soam Vs. CPIO, Dy. Director (Bldg.)
Central Information Commission Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1