Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.33 seconds)Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Apurba Sarkar vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 5 July, 2018
In fact, the petitioner is seeking to champion the cause of
persons who are not aggrieved by the Order dated July 5, 2018 passed
in W.P. No. 5941 (W) of 2018 (Apurba Sarkar v. The State of West
Bengal & Ors.) and the four writ petitions dealt with by such order.
No right of the petitioner stands infringed by any action or inaction of
the respondent no. 5. There is no lis pending between the petitioner
and any of the respondents for the petitioner to complain that the
respondent no. 5 is not acting. The respondent no. 5 is not a person
entitled to make a complaint of defection under Section 21B of the Act
of 1993.
Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru ... vs State Of Kerala And Anr on 24 April, 1973
In His Holiness Kesavananda
Bharati Sripadagalvaru v. State of Kerala and Anr. (1973) 4
SCC 225, a thirteen Judge Bench of this Court held
that Article 368 of the Constitution does not enable the
Parliament to alter the basic structure or framework of the
Constitution. The basic structure of the Constitution could not
be altered by any constitutional amendment and it was held
in unambiguous terms that one of the basic features is the
existence of constitutional system in judicial review.
Minerva Mills Ltd. And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 9 May, 1980
This
view was followed by a Constitution Bench in Minerva Mills
Ltd. and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. (1980) 3 SCC 625.
Bharati Reddy vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 March, 2018
Bharati Reddy (supra) considers a writ petition filed by voters
who are not members of a Zilla Panchayat challenging the election of a
person to the office of Adhyaksha. It holds such writ petition to be
maintainable. It is of the following view:-