Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.39 seconds)Abdul Kadir Shamsuddin Bubere vs Madhav Prabhakar Oak on 20 September, 1961
In this connection, reliance was placed in a decision of this Court in
1
the case of Abdul Kadir Shamsuddin Bubere vs. Madhav
Prabhakar Oak and Another,[ AIR 1962 SC 406] in which this
court under para 17 held as under:
Haryana Telecom Ltd vs Sterlite Industires (India) Ltd on 13 July, 1999
11. In our view and relying on the aforesaid observations of this
Court in the aforesaid decision and going by the ratio of the above
mentioned case, the facts of the present case does not warrant the
matter to be tried and decided by the Arbitrator, rather for the
furtherance of justice, it should be tried in a court of law which would
be more competent and have the means to decide such a
complicated matter involving various questions and issues raised in
the present dispute. This view has been further enunciated and
affirmed by this Court in the decision of Haryana Telecom Ltd. vs.
Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd.[ AIR 1999 SC 2354], wherein this
court under para 4 observed :
H.G. Oomor Sait And Another vs O. Aslam Sait on 28 June, 2001
12. The learned counsel for the respondent further elaborated his
contention citing the decision of the High Court of Judicature at
Madras in the case of Oomor Sait HG Vs. Asiam Sait, 2001 (3) CTC
269, wherein it was held:
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
The Indian Partnership Act, 1932
Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd vs M/S. Pinkcity Midway Petroleums on 23 July, 2003
8. Reliance was placed by the learned counsel for the appellant
on a decision of this Court in the case of Hindustan Petroleum
1
Corpn. Ltd. vs. Pinkcity Midway Petroleums [2003 (6) SCC 503],
wherein this Court in Para 14 observed:
The Indian Contract Act, 1872
1