Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (2.37 seconds)Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 116 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Vaman Narain Ghiya vs State Of Rajasthan on 12 December, 2008
The present
case is not one of money laundering. It is a simple cheque bounce case
and the amount of default would not be a relevant consideration. The
impugned order is legal and in accordance with law and it deserves to be
upheld. Reliance is placed upon 'Vaman Narain Ghiya Vs. State of
Rajasthan, 2009(1) RCR (Criminal) 473', 'State of Punjab Vs.
Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar and others, 2012(1) RCR (Criminal)
126', 'State Rep. by D.S.P, S.B. C.I.D., Chennai Vs. K.V. Rajendran
and others, 2008(4) RCR (Criminal), 278' and 'Satya Narayan
Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan, 2001(4) RCR (Criminal) 377.'
Pritpal Singh Alias Bitta vs State Of Punjab And Another on 25 November, 2011
Terms as to bail bonds and sureties
can be imposed by the Court, but no condition can be imposed as the
same would amount to curtailing the statutory right under Section 436
Cr.P.C. The judgment of this Court in Pritpal Singh's case (supra),
cannot apply to the facts of this case as in the said case the accused person
did not appear before the trial Court on a particular date of hearing
resulting in cancellation of his bail and surety bonds. Thereafter, when
the accused person was brought before the Court while granting bail
condition of deposit of passport was imposed.
1