Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (1.54 seconds)

Gaddipati Divija vs Pathuri Samrajyam on 18 April, 2023

Let us give an example. Take a case where there is a contract for sale for a consideration of Rs. 10 lakhs and earnest money of Rs. 1 lakh was paid and the vendor wrongly refuses to execute the sale deed unless the purchaser is ready to pay Rs. 15 lakhs. In such a case there is a clear breach by the defendant. But in that case, if the plaintiff did not have the balance Rs. 9 lakhs (and the money required for stamp duty and registration) or the capacity to arrange and pay such money, when the contract had to be performed, the plaintiff will not be entitled to specific performance, even if he proves breach by the defendant, as he was not “ready and willing” to perform his obligations.” 15 / 22 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 6 - K Murari - Full Document

Saradamani Kandappan vs S. Rajalakshmi & Ors on 4 July, 2011

18. As pointed out by the Hon'ble Supreme Court keeping in mind the change of circumstances particularly having regard to the inflation and steep rise in price for immovable property through out the country, we prefer to follow the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Saradamani Kandappan's case. We have already seen that the suit has been filed nearly 2 years 3 months after the time specified in the agreement for performance to pay the balance. We have already seen that the obligation of plaintiff to pay the balance is unconditional and he was required to forego the amount, which he had paid as advance, if he fails to pay as stipulated. He is unable to pay the balance within the time stipulated. In such event, the delay in filing the suit with an unreasonable explanation is fatal and therefore, the suit is liable to be dismissed. The Trial Court has rightly held that the suit is also liable to be dismissed on the ground of laches.
Supreme Court of India Cites 33 - Cited by 435 - Full Document
1