Jaipur Development Authority vs Radhey Shyam on 17 February, 1994
By the award, visibly, the appellant's/writ petitioner's predecessor-in-interest had been granted monetary compensation. He was, at the relevant time, in occupation of a government land. Even assuming that the recommendation to allot, along with six other awardees, a plot of land in the scheme area or otherwise, had been advisory in nature and not in lieu of compensation, the same, by no means, would vest an inviolable right in the appellant/writ petitioner to constitute an actionable claim justiciable in law. The distinction sought to be highlighted on his behalf thus, cannot be sustained. The fundamental legal principle, as enounced in Jaipur Development Authority Vs. Radhey Shyam (supra) and reiterated in the subsequent decisions, in our considered view, does not get diluted, even if the recommendation in the award for allotment of a plot of land to the appellant's/writ petitioner's predecessor-in-interest, is in addition to the compensation otherwise granted.