Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.42 seconds)

M/S. Econ Antri Ltd vs M/S. Rom Industries Ltd. & Anr on 26 August, 2013

(ii) The contention was that the use of the word „from‟ was clearly indicative of the fact that the base year had to be excluded, while discounting the eligible capital expenditure made by the petitioner. In support of this submission reference was made to Section 9 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 and extracts from the 37th Edition of Halsbury Laws of England, Volume III, page 92. Furthermore, reliance was placed on the following judgements: Tarun Prasad Chatterjee vs Dina Nath Sharma, (2000) 8 SCC 649; Econ Antri Ltd. vs Rom Industries Ltd. & Anr., AIR WP(C) 3625/2013 Page 7 of 17 2013 SC 3283 and B.P. Thakur vs State, AIR 1959 All. 787
Supreme Court of India Cites 52 - Cited by 52 - P Sathasivam - Full Document

M.P. Oil Extraction And Anr. Etc vs State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors on 9 July, 1997

(iv) This apart, it was also sought to be argued that the petitioner had made the investments based on a legitimate expectation that it would be entitled to the subsidy which was available under the 2007 notification to eligible manufacturing units. This submission was sought to be supported by relying upon the following judgements of the Supreme Court : M.P. Oil Extraction vs State of M.P., (1997) 7 SCC 592 and Nav Jyoti CGHS Ltd. & Ors. vs Union of India & Ors.,(1992) 4 SCC 477.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 457 - G N Ray - Full Document

Balco Employees Union (Regd.) vs Union Of India & Ors on 10 December, 2001

(iv) It was further submitted that the court while examining the validity of an executive decision relating to economic matters should grant a certain WP(C) 3625/2013 Page 9 of 17 measure of freedom or "play in the joints" to the executive. It was contended that each error of the government ought not to be subjected to judicial review. For this proposition reliance was sought to be placed on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of : BALCO Employees' Union (Regd.) vs Union of India & Ors., (2002) 2 SCC 333.
Supreme Court of India Cites 48 - Cited by 1192 - Full Document
1   2 Next