Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.36 seconds)
S Nagaraj vs Deptt Of Posts on 26 September, 2025 cites

Kamal Singh Kanhaiyalal Parihar Son Of ... vs Union Of India And Others on 8 April, 2010

"38. When we carefully read the judgment in N. R. Parmar (Supra), it appears to us that the referred OMs (dated 07.02.1986 and 03.07.1986) were not properly construed in the judgment. Contrary to the eventual finding, the said two OMs had made it clear that seniority of the direct recruits be declared only from the date of appointment and not from the date of initiation of recruitment process. But surprisingly, the judgment while referring to the illustration given in the OM in fact overlooks the effect of the said illustration.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 43 - A G Masih - Full Document

K. Meghachandra Singh And 6 Ors vs Ningam Siro And 42 Ors on 24 May, 2019

64. It is pertinent to note that the said DoP&T clarifications at Annexure R-13 was dated 21.12.2017, much before the judgment in K. Meghachandra Singh came and was much earlier than the DoP&T lead O.M dated 13.8.2021. And clearly the said clarifications had no benefit of the subsequent Apex Court judgment and order in the case of K.Meghachandra Singh (supra) followed by the DoP&T opinion SHAIN SHAINEY CAT VIJU EY Bangalore 2025.09.26 12:20:28 VIJU +05'30' 55 O.A.Nos.170/00008/2023/CAT/BANGALORE dated 13.8.2021 in their O.M No.20011/2/2019-Estt.(D) wherein the DoP&T had mentioned at paragraph 7(iii) that in case of direct recruits and promotees appointed/joined during the period between 27.11.2012 and 18.11.2019 and in which case inter se seniority could not be finalized by 18.11.2019, shall also be governed by the provisions of O.Ms dated 7.2.1986/3.7.1986 read with O.M dated 4.3.2014, unless where a different formulation/manner of determination of seniority has been decided by any Tribunal or Court.
Gauhati High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 122 - Full Document

C.N. Palayyan, I.J. Baby, L. ... vs The Union Of India (Uoi), Rep. By The ... on 11 April, 2003

In the cases before us it is not denied that the applicants before us were promotees selected by LDCE and had joined the cadre of the Inspector of Post in the years between 2004-2007 (2004, 2005, 2006, 2007), and their rival direct recruits (from SSC) were selected and joined between 2007- 2009 (2007, 2008, 2009) much before the Hon'ble Apex Court passed the order in N.R Parmar v. Union of India supra on 27.11.2012. Hence, in our considered opinion, such cases will be governed not by the DoP&T O.M of 4.3.2014, but all the O. Ms which preceded the said O.M i.e., the O.M dated 7.2.1986, 3.7.1986 and the O. M dated 3.3.2008
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 182 - P K Misra - Full Document
1