Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.34 seconds)Section 106 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Foreigners Act, 1946
The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
Narbada Devi Gupta vs Birendra Kumar Jaiswal And Anr on 3 November, 2003
In Narbada Devi Gupta vs Birendra
K um ar Jaisw al, (2003) 8 SCC 745, Supreme Court reiterated the legal
position that marking of documents as exhibits and their proof are two different
legal concepts. Mere production and marking of a document as exhibit cannot be
held to be due proof of its contents. Its execution has to be proved by admissible
evidence i.e., by the evidence of those persons who can vouchsafe for the truth
of the facts in issue.
Section 8 in The Foreigners Act, 1946 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Lic Of India vs R. Suresh on 14 March, 2008
32. This proposition was again re-stated by the Supreme Court in L.I.C. vs
R am Pal Singh Bisen, (2010) 4 SCC 491, wherein it has been held that mere
admission of a document in evidence does not amount to its proof; in other
words, mere marking of exhibit on a document does not dispense with its proof
which is required to be done in accordance with law. Under the law of evidence,
it is necessary that contents of documents are required to be proved either by
primary or by secondary evidence. At the most, admission of documents may
amount to admission of contents but not its truth. Contents of the document
cannot be proved by merely filing in a court. Such a document cannot be relied
upon.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 6A in The Citizenship Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
1