Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.17 seconds)Section 6 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Centrlal Board Of Sec.Education & Anr vs Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors on 9 August, 2011
In this context a reference was made to the Hon'ble Supreme Court decision in 2011 (8) SCC
497 (CBSE and Anr. Vs. Aditya Bandopadhyay and Ors), wherein it was held as under:
Dr. Celsa Pinto, Ex-Officio Joint ... vs The Goa State Information Commission ... on 3 April, 2008
Similarly, the High Court of Bombay in Dr. Celsa Pinto, Ex-Officio Joint Secretary (School
Education) vs The Goa State Information Commission on 3 April, 2008 (2008 (110) Bom L R
1238) had held as under:
Shri S.K. Kapoor vs Securities And Exchange Board Of India ... on 30 January, 2009
The definition cannot include within its fold answers to the question why which would be
the same thing as asking the reason for a justification for a particular thing. The Public
Information Authorities cannot expect to communicate to the citizen the reason why a
certain thing was done or not done in the sense of a justification because the citizen
Page 3 of 4
makes a requisition about information. Justifications are matter within the domain of
adjudicating authorities and cannot properly be classified as information."
Furthermore, the Commission in the decision of K.S. Prasad vs SEBI CIC/AT/A/2007/007/00234
had held as under:
The Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
1