Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.41 seconds)Section 29 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 124 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Sk Sachdeva & Anr. vs Shri Educare Limited & Anr. on 25 January, 2016
In S.K. Sachdeva v. Shri
Educare Ltd.2, the Division Bench of this Court held that the
omission, on the part of the plaintiff, from placing such a document on
record ipso facto disentitled the plaintiff to interlocutory relief. Para
16 of the report in S.K. Sachdeva reads thus:
Mr. Raman Kwatra & Anr. vs Kei Industries Limited on 6 January, 2023
14. Ms. Ahlawat has also relied on the judgment of the Division
Bench of this Court in Raman Kwatra v. KEI Industries Ltd1,
specifying particularly on para 43 thereof. She submits that the
position in law, as clearly enunciated in that passage, is that, if the
plaintiffs obtain registration of a mark, and, during the process of
examination of the plaintiffs‟ application prior to grant of registration,
the defendants‟ mark is set up as a rival mark to that of the plaintiffs,
then, the plaintiffs would be bound by the stand adopted by it while
justifying its claim to registration in the face of the rival mark of the
defendants.
1