Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.26 seconds)The Limitation Act, 1963
Article 113 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 58 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 11 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Y.B. Patil And Ors vs Y.L. Patil on 23 August, 1976
17. Learned Counsel for the defendant has relied on Y.B. Patil and Ors. v. Y.L. Patil, AIR 1977 SC 392 wherein the Supreme Court has held that once an order made in the course of proceedings becomes final it would be binding at the subsequent stage of that proceeding. Where an order passed by the High Court had become final on account of its not being challenged, the same would operate as res judicata and would be binding at the subsequent stage of the same proceedings.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Harinarayan Srivastav vs United Commercial Bank & Anr on 31 March, 1997
19. Learned Counsel for the defendant has relied on Harinarayan Srivastav v. United Commercial Bank and Anr. wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has upheld the bipartite settlement which require permission to be obtained by the delinquent employee to seek the assistance of an advocate in disciplinary proceedings. However, since I am of the view that the suit is barred by limitation and by res-judicata, as aforesaid, it is not necessary for me to go into this question.