Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.26 seconds)

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs Poulose on 23 September, 2002

Obviously, the above verdict passed by the Apex Court was not brought to the notice of the Full Bench of this Court while passing the judgment in Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Poulose [2004(1) KLT 8] (FB). But since the verdict passed by the Apex Court is the 'law of the land' by virtue of Article 141 of the Constitution of India, we are bound to follow the same.
Kerala High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 17 - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Vidhyadhar Mahariwala & Ors on 17 September, 2008

The law in this MACANO.2181/2007 7 regard has been reiterated by the Apex Court in Ishwar Chandra and others Vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. and others [2007 (10) SCC 650]; in National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Vidhyadhar Mahariwala and others [2008 (12) SCC 701] and also in Ram babu Tiwari Vs. United India Insurance Company and others [2008 ACJ 2654]. As it stands, the finding rendered by the Tribunal to the contrary, holding that "once a licence, always a licence" is thoroughly wrong and misconceived and it is hereby set aside. It is found that the driver was not having valid and effective driving licence on the date of the accident; i.e., on 03.09.2000 and that there was clear violation of the statutory/policy conditions.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 270 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Ram Babu Tiwari vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors on 1 August, 2008

The law in this MACANO.2181/2007 7 regard has been reiterated by the Apex Court in Ishwar Chandra and others Vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. and others [2007 (10) SCC 650]; in National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Vidhyadhar Mahariwala and others [2008 (12) SCC 701] and also in Ram babu Tiwari Vs. United India Insurance Company and others [2008 ACJ 2654]. As it stands, the finding rendered by the Tribunal to the contrary, holding that "once a licence, always a licence" is thoroughly wrong and misconceived and it is hereby set aside. It is found that the driver was not having valid and effective driving licence on the date of the accident; i.e., on 03.09.2000 and that there was clear violation of the statutory/policy conditions.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 120 - S B Sinha - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Kusum Rai & Ors on 24 March, 2006

Further, the scope of the decision in Swaran Singh's Case was subsequently considered by the Apex court on several occasions; in National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Kusum Rai [2006 (2) KLT 300], Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Meena variel [2007 (5) SCC 428], Prem Kumar and others Vs. Prahlad Dev and others [2008 (3) SCC 193], holding that, if the violation of policy condition in driving the vehicle without being possessed of a valid licence is established, it is enough to absolve the insurer from the liability.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 535 - S B Sinha - Full Document

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs Meena Variyal & Ors on 2 April, 2007

Further, the scope of the decision in Swaran Singh's Case was subsequently considered by the Apex court on several occasions; in National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Kusum Rai [2006 (2) KLT 300], Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Meena variel [2007 (5) SCC 428], Prem Kumar and others Vs. Prahlad Dev and others [2008 (3) SCC 193], holding that, if the violation of policy condition in driving the vehicle without being possessed of a valid licence is established, it is enough to absolve the insurer from the liability.

Ishwar Chandra & Ors vs The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors on 8 March, 2007

The law in this MACANO.2181/2007 7 regard has been reiterated by the Apex Court in Ishwar Chandra and others Vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. and others [2007 (10) SCC 650]; in National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Vidhyadhar Mahariwala and others [2008 (12) SCC 701] and also in Ram babu Tiwari Vs. United India Insurance Company and others [2008 ACJ 2654]. As it stands, the finding rendered by the Tribunal to the contrary, holding that "once a licence, always a licence" is thoroughly wrong and misconceived and it is hereby set aside. It is found that the driver was not having valid and effective driving licence on the date of the accident; i.e., on 03.09.2000 and that there was clear violation of the statutory/policy conditions.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 292 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1   2 Next