Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.44 seconds)
Karmajyot Co-Operative Hosg. Society ... vs State Of Gujarat on 3 March, 2023 cites

A.V. Papayya Sastry & Ors vs Government Of A.P. & Ors on 7 March, 2007

 The Apex Court in the case of Satluj Jal Vidyut (supra) has summarized the position of law while considering the judgment in the case of A.V. Papayya Sastry vs. State of A.P. (supra), and it is held that "the judgment, decree or order obtained by playing fraud on the Court, tribunal or authority is nullity and such judgment, decree or order can be challenged in any Court at any time in appeal, writ, revision or even in collateral proceedings". Thus, this Court in the present writ petition is empowered to quash and set aside the consent decrees obtained by fraud by invoking the inherent powers conferred under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 629 - C K Thakker - Full Document

United India Insurance Co. Ltd vs Rajendra Singh & Ors on 14 March, 2000

C/SCA/2204/2004 CAV JUDGMENT DATED: 03/03/2023  The Coordinate Bench of this Court has also placed reliance on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of United India Insurance Company Limited Vs. Rajendra Singh & Ors., AIR 2000 S.C.C. 1165. The aforesaid interim order has become final and has not been challenged by the respondents before any higher forum. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, the In-Charge Principal Senior Civil Judge, Vadodara has prepared a report, which was forwarded to this Court. The aforesaid report dated 02.01.2006 prepared by In-Charge Principal Civil Judge, Vadodara, clearly indicates that the fraud has been committed in the proceedings of Special Civil Suit No.637 of 2000. In-Charge Principal Civil Judge has observed thus:
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 474 - K T Thomas - Full Document

Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. vs Raj Kumar Rajinder Singh(D)Thru Lrs on 24 September, 2018

 The Apex Court in the case of Satluj Jal Vidyut (supra) has summarized the position of law while considering the judgment in the case of A.V. Papayya Sastry vs. State of A.P. (supra), and it is held that "the judgment, decree or order obtained by playing fraud on the Court, tribunal or authority is nullity and such judgment, decree or order can be challenged in any Court at any time in appeal, writ, revision or even in collateral proceedings". Thus, this Court in the present writ petition is empowered to quash and set aside the consent decrees obtained by fraud by invoking the inherent powers conferred under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court of India Cites 79 - Cited by 37 - A Mishra - Full Document
1   2 Next