Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (1.03 seconds)

D.S. Nakara & Others vs Union Of India on 17 December, 1982

"Category-I Para 22. If the person retiring is eligible for pension at the time of his retirement and if he survives till the time of subsequent amendment of the relevant pension scheme, he would become eligible to get enhanced pension or would become eligible to get more pension as per the new formula of computation of pension subsequently brought into force, he would be entitled lo get the benefit of the amended pension provision from the date of such order as he would be a member of the very same class of pensioners when the additional benefit is being conferred on all of them. In such a situation, the additional benefit available to the same class of pensioners cannot be denied to him on the ground that he had retired prior to the date on which the aforesaid additional benefit was conferred on all the members of the same class of pensioners who had survived by the time the scheme granting additional benefit to these pensioners came into force. The line of decisions tracing their roots to the ratio of Nakara case would cover this category of cases Category-II Para 23. However, if an employee at the time of his retirement is not eligible for earning pension and stands outside the class of pensioners, if subsequently by amendment of the relevant pension rules any beneficial umbrella of pension scheme is extended to cover a new class of pensioners and when such a subsequent scheme comes into force, the erstwhile non- pensioner might have survived, then only if such extension of pension scheme to erstwhile non-pensioners is expressly made retrospective by the authorities promulgating such scheme; the erstwhile non-pensioner who has retired prior to the advent of such extended pension scheme can claim benefit of such a new extended pension scheme."
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 2485 - D A Desai - Full Document

V. Kasturi vs Managing Director, State Bank Of India, ... on 9 October, 1998

That Rule is modified and the petitioners seek relief on the basis of the amended rule on the ground that there cannot be any discrimination between the employees who retired prior to or after a particular date, as held in Nakara 's case which is followed by this Court in various decisions including V. Kasturi (Supra). Further, there, is no question of pensioners (retired employees) dividing the pension fund and/ or payment of pension to be made only from the pension fund. The liability to pay pension arises because of provision made in the rules.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 130 - M J Rao - Full Document
1