Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.22 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record ... vs Union Of India on 16 October, 2015
13. It is also submitted that under such circumstances any
disclosure of information pertaining to such Aadhaar number
holder without giving an opportunity of hearing to him under
section 33(1) would not only be in violation of the mandate of
the Aadhaar Act, 2016 (as amended) but would also further
erode the very purpose of the judgement passed by the
Constitution bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Justice K.S.
Puttuswamy (Retd.) and Anr. Vs Union of India reported as 2019
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 17/04/2025 02:41:44 pm )
10/18 WP No. 10658 of 2025
1 SCC 1 as per which a prior hearing to the concerned Aadhaar
number holder is inevitable. It is also submitted that disclosure
of any Information without giving an opportunity of hearing to
the concerned Aadhaar number holder would be in violation of
Article 20(3) of the Constitution as well as the privacy rights or
other rights of that person(s).
Justice K.S.Puttaswamy(Retd) And Anr. vs Union Of India And Ors. on 24 August, 2017
17. In the light of the legal provisions of the Aadhaar Act,
2016 (as amended) and the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme
Court of India passed in Writ Petition No. 494 of 2012 [Justice
K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Another Vs Union of India and
Others], it is respectfully ad submitted that sharing of the
information without hearing the concerned Aadhaar Number
Holder i.e. Aadhaar Number xxxx-xxxx-0216 shall violate the
privacy of that person under Section 33 (1) of the Aadhaar Act.
Hence, it is prayed that an appropriate direction in accordance
with the above-mentioned provisions may be passed, as deemed
fit by this Hon'ble Court that would enable this respondent to act
accordingly.
Section 28 in The Aadhaar (Authentication) Regulations, 2016 [Entire Act]
1