Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.24 seconds)Cbi Hyderabad vs Subramani Gopalakrishnan And Anr on 21 April, 2011
15. These principles have been reiterated by another two
Judge Bench decision in Central Bureau of Investigation,
Hyderabad v Subramani Gopalakrishnan5 and more
recently in Dataram Singh v State of Uttar Pradesh:
Dataram Singh vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 6 February, 2018
15. These principles have been reiterated by another two
Judge Bench decision in Central Bureau of Investigation,
Hyderabad v Subramani Gopalakrishnan5 and more
recently in Dataram Singh v State of Uttar Pradesh:
Myakala Dharmarajam vs The State Of Telangana on 7 January, 2020
[9] Yet another decision delivered by Hon'ble Apex Court in
the case of Myakala Dharmarajam & Ors., v. State of
Telangana & Anr., reported in (2020) 2 SCC 743,
whereunder paragraph 8 held as under:-
Raghubir Singh & Others Etc vs State Of Bihar on 19 September, 1986
In Raghubir Singh v. State of Bihar2 this Court held
that bail can be cancelled where (i) the accused misuses
his liberty by indulging in similar criminal activity, (ii)
interferes with the course of investigation, (iii) attempts to
tamper with evidence or witnesses, (iv) threatens
Page 9 of 10
Downloaded on : Fri Aug 26 21:05:39 IST 2022
R/CR.MA/18367/2017 ORDER DATED: 26/08/2022
witnesses or indulges in similar activities which would
hamper smooth investigation, (v) there is likelihood of his
fleeing to another country, (vi) attempts to make himself
scarce by going underground or becoming unavailable to
the investigating agency, (vii) attempts to place himself
beyond the reach of his surety, etc. The above grounds are
illustrative and not exhaustive. It must also be
remembered that rejection of bail stands on one footing
but cancellation of bail is a harsh order because it
interferes with the liberty of the individual and hence it
must not be lightly resorted to."
Guria, Swayam Sevi Sansthan vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 31 July, 2009
[10] Yet another decision also deserves to be referred is the
decision in the case of Guria, Swayam Sevi Sansthan versus
State of Uttar Pradesh and others reported in (2009) 15
SCC 75 wherein relevant para 11 would clearly indicating that
at this stage its difficult to cancel bail once granted longback.
[11] A conjoint effect of this proposition and the case having
not been made out by the State authority to set aside the order
of April, 2017, this Court is of the considered opinion that
application being devoid of merit deserves to be dismissed.
Accordingly, the same stands dismissed. Notice is discharged.