Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.19 seconds)Anil Jain vs Jagdish Chander on 23 July, 1999
Thus a workman would be entitled for relief under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, if there is an award directing reinstatement of the workman and the employer has preferred proceedings against such award at the High Court or Supreme Court and that the workman had not been employed in any establishment during the period of pendency of such proceedings and an affidavit to that effect has been filed by the workman. On satisfaction of the requisites as laid down under Section 17B, the court is bound to grant relief to the workman in terms of the provision as laid down under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act. Also the Court cannot go into the merits of the case/writ petition while deciding an application under Section 17B of the Act as was held in , Anil Jain v. Jagdish Chander.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1