Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.17 seconds)
Dhapu Devi vs State Of Rajasthan & Anr on 11 January, 2018 cites

State Of Rajasthan vs Indira Devi on 19 July, 2017

8. This Court, in light of the aforementioned position of (5 of 5) [CW-333/2018] law, disposes of the present writ petition with the direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Safai Karamchari while not considering third child after 01.06.2002 as a disqualification. Such consideration shall be made within a period of 30 days from today in accordance with these directions as well as in consonance with the precedent law laid down by the Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court in the matter of State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs. Smt. Indira Devi (supra).
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 17 - Full Document

Javed & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 30 July, 2003

The fact that the candidate may have applied notwithstanding the stipulations in the advertisement cannot confer legality on the condition prescribed beyond the Rules. We therefore find no infirmity in the order of learned Single Judge. The Respondent is now required to be considered for appointment in accordance with the offer dated 17.12.2013. Reliance on Javed (supra) is misconceived as the challenge related to the vires of the provisions of Sections 175(1)(q) and 177(1) of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 incorporating a statutory requirement with regard to those having more than two children and which is not the case presently. The appeal is dismissed."
Supreme Court of India Cites 51 - Cited by 173 - R C Lahoti - Full Document
1