Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.18 seconds)
Jagdish Lal vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 20 January, 2025 cites

Gurmail Singh And Ors. Etc. Etc vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 25 October, 1990

"9. Taking note of the aforesaid aspects, this Court in Mohan Lal's case (supra) by relying upon the judgment of the Apex Court in Gurmail Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others, 1992 (7) SLR 744, allowed the writ pe on of the pe oners therein by holding that the services rendered by the employees in a corpora on fully funded and administered by the Page 6 of 10 6 of 10 ::: Downloaded on - 21-01-2025 06:20:45 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:007401 CWP No.1396 of 2014 (O&M) 2025:PHHC: 007401 CWP No.5634 of 2014 (O&M) 2025:PHHC: 007403 State of Haryana are to be counted with the number of years of service rendered by them in a department of the government to consider their eligibility for grant of pension.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 188 - Full Document

Darshan Singh @ Bhasuri & Ors vs State Of Punjab on 31 March, 1983

19. There is no merit in the conten on, as the Provident Fund amount of the pe oners deposited by the previous employer, i.e. respondent No.5 of the pe oners with Regional Provident Fund Commissioner can be transferred to the Municipal Corpora on, Pa ala and then, pe oners will be en tled all re ral beneļ¬ts including pension. Similar direc on was given by this Court in CWP No.16644 of 2008, tled as "Darshan Singh and others v. The State of Punjab and others", decided on 21.02.2011, copy of which has been annexed by the pe oners as Annexure P-20.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 67 - Y V Chandrachud - Full Document
1