Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.19 seconds)

Haryana Financial Corporation & Anr vs Kailash Chandra Ahuja on 8 July, 2008

Posting of officials of the 4 OA 828 /2018 reserved community nearer to their home towns has been envisaged by RBE 336/1985 to the extent practicable, implying other conditions have to be satisfied. The other condition in the present case is that the mutual transfer has to be between same communities. Besides, when the conditions of transfer are not satisfied forwarding the same to the competent authority would be an empty formality as the outcome is already known. It would be futile to pursue such empty formalities in the words of Hon'ble Apex Court in Haryana Financial Corpn. v. Kailash Chandra Ahuja,(2008) 9 SCC 31, the Apex Court has stated:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 227 - C K Thakker - Full Document

Abid Hussain And Others Etc vs Union Of India & Ors on 22 January, 1987

"It is not disputed that the Air-conditioned Coach-In-Charges- Attendants are being paid overtime allowances for extra duty hours exceeding 96 hours in two weeks in the Western Railway, Central Railway and Eastern Railway. There is no justification for denying overtime allowances on the same basis to the Air-conditioned Coach-In-Charges-Attendants in the Northern Railway. We accordingly direct the Union of India and the Railway Administration to pay with effect from July 1, 1984 the overtime allowances to the Air-conditioned Coach-In-Charges-Attendants working in the Northern Railway on the same basis on which the Air-conditioned Coach-In-Charges-Attendants in the other three Railways, referred to above, are paid. All arrears of such allowances up to date shall be paid as early as possible and in any event not later than four months from today. The benefit of this order shall be extended to all such employees including those who have retired and those who have not joined as petitioners herein."
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 61 - E S Venkataramiah - Full Document
1