Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.21 seconds)

Shri Amar Singh Trilochan Singh vs Smt. Jasoti on 28 May, 2003

In the aforementioned cases of Trilochan Singh Vs. Daya Shanker and Amar Singh Vs. Jasoti relied upon by the decree holders, the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi had conferred jurisdiction upon the Rent Controller for enquiry and determination of mesne profits. There was no finding of the Court that the Rent Controller by itself has jurisdiction to carry out this exercise. There was also no finding that the landlord is not required to pay court fees on the amount of mesne profits claimed.

Trilochan Singh vs Daya Shankar & Ors on 25 November, 2010

In the aforementioned cases of Trilochan Singh Vs. Daya Shanker and Amar Singh Vs. Jasoti relied upon by the decree holders, the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi had conferred jurisdiction upon the Rent Controller for enquiry and determination of mesne profits. There was no finding of the Court that the Rent Controller by itself has jurisdiction to carry out this exercise. There was also no finding that the landlord is not required to pay court fees on the amount of mesne profits claimed.
Delhi High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 11 - M C Garg - Full Document

Prakash H. Jain vs Ms. Marie Fernandes on 23 September, 2003

In this case of Prakash H. Jain Vs. Ms. Marie Fernandes, it was contended before the Hon'ble Supreme Court that the Competent Authority, being one which has all trappings of a Court, is a 'Court' in the eye of law and consequently possess inherent power to condone the delay as is available to any other Court under the Civil Procedure Code, all the more so when Sections 42 and 43 of the Act is indicative of the applicability of the provisions of the CPC. However, the Hon'ble Supreme Court did not accept this contention and held the following:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 42 - Cited by 112 - D Raju - Full Document
1   2 3 Next