Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.19 seconds)Section 13 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Delhi Rent Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
U. Po Naing vs The Burma Oil Company Limited. on 4 February, 1929
In this connection, it is useful to refer to the decision of the Privy Council in UPO Naing v. Burmal Oil Co. Ltd., 56 Ind App 140 : AIR 1929 PC 108. In that case the owner oE oil sites and grantee from Government of the right to win oil therefrom leased sites and the right to win oil for twenty-five years to the respondents, who agreed to pay royalties on oil won by them. In sinking wells, which did not produce oil in commercial quantities, the respondents found natural gas. They tapped the gas by pipes, and for six years used it for their own purpose.
Mahmad Umar Abdul Rahim Narmavala And ... vs Shah Manilal Gokaldas, (A Firm) And Ors. on 20 July, 1967
10. Similar view appears to have been taken by a single Judge of the Gun-rat High Court in Mahmad Umar v. Manilal, , where it was laid down that having regard to the provisions of Section 108(o) of the Transfer of Property Act, a change of user in the absence of a contract to the contrary, would not result in giving a cause of action for evicting the tenant unless it is further proved that it is either destructive or permanently injurious to the property or its produce in the eye of law.
The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
1