Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.27 seconds)The Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992
Section 3 in The Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 [Entire Act]
Section 15 in The Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 [Entire Act]
Section 16 in The Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 [Entire Act]
Section 19 in The Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 [Entire Act]
Section 11 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Section 124 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
M/S.S.Mira Commodities Pvt vs Union Of India on 8 September, 2008
20. In the present case, the DGFT has not resorted to change of categorization of items, i.e. from the category of free export to category of restricted export, but as a sequel to earlier notification No.18, which fixed the floor price of US $ 50 per square meter, the present impugned Notification has been issued. Therefore, I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the impugned notification in order to interfere with the same. The reliance placed upon "M/s.Mira Commodities case and "M/s.Bimal Kumar Modi case" by the learned counsel for the petitioner, cannot be made applicable to the present case inamsuch as in the said decisions, it has been held that the DGFT has resorted to amend the import & export policy, which is not permissible under the provisions of FTDR Act, but in exercise of Section 5 of the FTDR Act, the Central Government is only empowered to formulate and announce the export and import policy.