Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.37 seconds)State Of Maharashtra & Ors vs Ravi Prakash Babulalsing Parmar & Anr on 31 October, 2006
12. In her cross examination as well PW1 Asha Mishra had denied that she
had seen accused snatching the bag from her. As per the explanation furnished by
witness, the accused had snatched her bag from behind and had fled away. Thus, it
must be possible that complainant had not seen the person snatching her bag. Further
there is no MLC or other document on record to show that assault or criminal force
was used by the accused while snatching the bag. In the absence of any testimony of
complainant in this regard and also in the absence of MLC, it cannot be presumed that
complainant was assaulted or criminal force was used against her. Since the
State Vs. Ravi And Anr FIR No. : 219/2014 PS Hauz Khas
U/s 356/379/411/34 IPC Page no.4 of 5
FIR No. 219/2014 State vs Ravi And Anr CS No. 1327/2017
complainant had denied the identity of accused, it could not be proved in the case
that the purse of complainant was snatched by the accused from the hands of
complainant.
Section 356 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 411 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 379 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Praveen Sharma (Since Deceased) And 2 ... vs Ravi Kumar And Another on 6 March, 2019
12. In her cross examination as well PW1 Asha Mishra had denied that she
had seen accused snatching the bag from her. As per the explanation furnished by
witness, the accused had snatched her bag from behind and had fled away. Thus, it
must be possible that complainant had not seen the person snatching her bag. Further
there is no MLC or other document on record to show that assault or criminal force
was used by the accused while snatching the bag. In the absence of any testimony of
complainant in this regard and also in the absence of MLC, it cannot be presumed that
complainant was assaulted or criminal force was used against her. Since the
State Vs. Ravi And Anr FIR No. : 219/2014 PS Hauz Khas
U/s 356/379/411/34 IPC Page no.4 of 5
FIR No. 219/2014 State vs Ravi And Anr CS No. 1327/2017
complainant had denied the identity of accused, it could not be proved in the case
that the purse of complainant was snatched by the accused from the hands of
complainant.