Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.77 seconds)

Surinder Singh Alias Chhinda And Anr vs State Of Punjab on 31 August, 2006

It was also argued that nobody was hurt in the occurrence and therefore, the prosecution case is untenable. Counsel for the appellants also pointed out that according to Kulwant Singh, Patwari, PW8 who prepared scaled site plan, distance of point 'C" depicted in the plan where the witnesses were present, was 6 acres i.e. 400 yards approximately from point 'D' where the accused were present and from where the accused fired shots. It was, thus, submitted that if shots were fired from distance of 400 yards, the same were Criminal Appeal No. 664-SB of 2000 -10- not likely to cause any harm to the prosecution witnesses much less cause their death. Reliance in support of this contention has been place on judgment of Bench of three Hon'ble Judges of this Court in Sarvinder Singh alias Chhinda & another vs. The State, 1977 CLR (Pb. & Har.)
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 15 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 Next