Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.22 seconds)State Of Punjab vs Balbir Singh on 1 March, 1994
5. In the present case the case of the prosecution is that on August 21, 1990, on the basis of the information received by P.W. 4, the Sub-Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Kozhikode, that the appellant is by the side of the High Way Tourist Home with brown sugar in his possession, P.W. 4 along with other constables proceeded to the said place at 8.30 P.M. and that when they reached there they saw the appellant and the search of the appellant revealed a match box with him containing four small packets containing brown sugar weighing 370 mg. In other words, the case of the prosecution is that the search of the appellant was conducted by P.W. 4, the Sub-Inspector of Police on the basis of a prior information about his having brown sugar in his possession. The case, therefore, falls under conclusion (5) lain down by this Court in State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh (supra).
The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
Section 21 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Ali Mustafa Abdul Rahman Moosa vs State Of Kerala on 28 September, 1994
3. The only question that has been raised by Shri T.N. Singh, the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant, is that the conviction and sentence cannot be sustained since there has been non-compliance with the provisions of Section 50 of the Act which have been held to be mandatory in the recent decisions of this Court in the State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh , and All Mustaffa Abdul Rahman Moosa v. State of Kerala .
1