Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.31 seconds)Nagendra Nath Mondal vs The State Of West Bengal on 13 January, 1972
15. An act, affecting public order, may have ramifications over law and
order and security of the State at the same time [See: Kishori Mohan Bahra
Vs. State of West Bengal, (1972) 3 SCC 845, Pushkar Mukherji Vs. State of
West Bengal, (1969) 1 SCC 10, Arun Ghosh Vs. State of West Bengal,
(1970) 1 SCC 98, Nagendra Nath Mondal Vs. State of West Bengal, (1972)
1 SCC 498].
Pushkar Mukherjee & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal on 7 November, 1968
15. An act, affecting public order, may have ramifications over law and
order and security of the State at the same time [See: Kishori Mohan Bahra
Vs. State of West Bengal, (1972) 3 SCC 845, Pushkar Mukherji Vs. State of
West Bengal, (1969) 1 SCC 10, Arun Ghosh Vs. State of West Bengal,
(1970) 1 SCC 98, Nagendra Nath Mondal Vs. State of West Bengal, (1972)
1 SCC 498].
Section 153A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The National Security Act, 1980 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The National Security Act, 1980 [Entire Act]
The National Security Act, 1980
Section 3 in The National Security Act, 1980 [Entire Act]
Deepak Bajaj vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 12 November, 2008
10. The Apex Court in the case of Deepak Bajaj v/s State of
Maharashtra & Another reported in (2008) 16 SCC 14 has cautioned the
High Courts regarding scope of jurisdiction and scope of High Court to
grant relief in such matters. According to Apex Court; scope is very narrow
and limited and subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority cannot be
looked by the High Court as appellate authority.