Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.61 seconds)Section 125 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Ram Prasanna Dash vs Bhabani Devi on 23 April, 1990
In (1990) 3 Ori CR 344; Sri Ram Prasanna Dash v. Bhabani Devi this Court held that Bhabani Devi is not entitled to maintenance underm Section 125 when Civil Court has granted a decree declaring the marriage as null and void.
Smt. Kishan Pyari vs Smt. Shanti Devi on 17 January, 1977
In 1988 (2) Crimes 599 : (1989 Cri LJ 439); Hari Kishan v. Smt. Shanti Devi, order of maintenance in favour of the daughter of Shanti Devi was cancelled under Section 127, Cr.P.C. on the ground of illegitimacy of that girl.
Smt. Vanamala vs Shri H.M.Ranganatha Bhatta on 27 July, 1995
In the case of Vanamala v. H.M. Ranganatha Bhatta (1995) IV CCR 1 (SC) while considering the question of entitlement to maintenance of a divorce on mutual consent vis-a-vis the provisions of law under Section 125(1) of the Code the Apex Court while answering it in favour of the divorcee have been pleased to propound that-
Gurmit Kaur vs Surjit Singh @ Jeet Singh on 28 November, 1995
In the case of Gurmit Kaur v. Surjit Singh @ Jeet Singh (1996) 1 CCR 56 (SC) while considering a similar issue of agreement for a divorce and thereafter remaining separately by mutual consent, the Apex Court have been pleased to held that-
Mariyumma vs Mohammed Ibrahim on 28 June, 1978
5. In view of the divorce agreement referred to hereinabove, the marital relations have come to a terminus. By virtue thereof, the respondent had already contracted the second marriage. In other words, the first marriage has been put to an end. The appellant thereby became entitled to claim maintenance and will continue to do so, so long as she remains unmarried and she is unable to maintain herself in the cases of Mariyumma v. Mohammed Ibrahim AIR 1978 Ker 231 (FB); Mampokkattu Nanu v. Mampokkat Vasantha 1986 Cri LJ 652 (Ker); Biswanath Saha v. Sikha Saha (Calcutta) 1986 Cri LJ 1199 and L. Srinivasulu Reddy v. L. Ramalakshumma (1996) 3 CCR 352 (DB) (AP) similar view has been expressed entitling a wife to get maintenance even after a decree of divorce obtained against her on the ground of unreasonably withdrawing from the society of the husband.