Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.26 seconds)Section 6 in The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [Entire Act]
Sanjay Chandra vs Cbi on 23 November, 2011
R/CR.MA/91/2022 CAV ORDER DATED: 07/03/2022
5.2 The Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Sanjay
Chandra Vs. CBI, [2012 1 SCC 40], has referred the
case of State of Kerala Vs. Raneef, [(2011) 1 SCC
784], to observe that in deciding the bail applications an
important factor which should certainly be taken into
consideration by the court is the delay in concluding the
trial. Here, taking into consideration the course of
investigation adopted by the Department, the evidence,
so collected, the trial will take considerable time and it
may happen, if denied bail, the judicial custody be
prolonged beyond the statutory period of punishment
which is for five years.
Arnesh Kumar vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 2 July, 2014
4.12 Mr. Sharma stated that the case law relied on
by the applicant in case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of
Bihar (supra) is not applicable in the present case as the
case law is of pre-GST era and have totally different
circumstances to this case and stated that furtehr int hes
aid case the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed that, if
there are reasons to believe that the accused will further
Page 14 of 20
Downloaded on : Mon Mar 07 21:36:57 IST 2022
R/CR.MA/91/2022 CAV ORDER DATED: 07/03/2022
commit the offence, tamper the evidence, prevent any
person from making and inducement etc., the person may
be arrested and in the present case, it is on record that
the accused had never cooperated with the investigation,
submitted wrong facts, therefore, there are chance that
he will try to hamper the investigation and will try to
induce the witnesses, therefore, urged that the present
application may be rejected.
Tejas Pravin Dugad vs Union Of India, Through The Minsitry Of ... on 15 January, 2021
4322-4324/2019] (vii) judgment of Bombay High Court in
case of Mr. Tejas Pravin Dugad Vs. Union of India &
Ors [Criminal Writ Petition No.1715 of 2020] (viii)
Ramjas Foundation and Ors. Vs. UOI And Ors. [Civil
Appeal No.6662 of 2004].
State Of Kerala vs Raneef on 3 January, 2011
R/CR.MA/91/2022 CAV ORDER DATED: 07/03/2022
5.2 The Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Sanjay
Chandra Vs. CBI, [2012 1 SCC 40], has referred the
case of State of Kerala Vs. Raneef, [(2011) 1 SCC
784], to observe that in deciding the bail applications an
important factor which should certainly be taken into
consideration by the court is the delay in concluding the
trial. Here, taking into consideration the course of
investigation adopted by the Department, the evidence,
so collected, the trial will take considerable time and it
may happen, if denied bail, the judicial custody be
prolonged beyond the statutory period of punishment
which is for five years.