Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.20 seconds)
Zakariya P.P vs Union Territory Of Lakshadweep on 22 August, 2016 cites

Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Ors vs Ram Ratan Yadav on 26 February, 2003

'The consideration which may be relevant to the case is of the antecedents of the candidates. The appointing authority has to focus on this aspect to arrive at a conclusion whether appointment is to be given to the candidates or not. The fact that the post to which the applicants seeks appointments is a post of a teacher which will have some impact on the minds of the students of impressionable age as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ram Ratan Yadav Case (Supra) according to the respondents also may have to be gone into by the respondents - respondent when the matter is reconsidered.' Therefore, it is clear that the job to which the applicant has applied cannot be ignored while deciding the matter. The jobs like Teacher, Doctor and Police etc. are jobs which involve a position of responsibility in the society and the incumbents holding such posts should possess absolute integrity. A person with criminal antecedents, criminal background or criminal tendency cannot be considered for appointment as teachers or as members of disciplined force getting training in arms and ammunitions.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 263 - S V Patil - Full Document

R.P. Kapur vs Pratap Singh Kairon And Others on 9 August, 1961

4. Heard the counsel for the parties and considered the written submissions made. Applicant would argue that persons involved in cases of theft, rape, swindling of money or cases of moral turpitude should be kept away from Government/Public employment. Applicant argues that his character and morals are not suspect as he is the 16 th accused in the case. Further the applicant states that he had submitted information of the pending criminal case in the disclosure form. Applicant cites the case of R.P.Kapur Vs. Pratap Singh 1964 (1) Cri.LJ 224 wherein the Apex Court had held that if a FIR has been recorded against a government servant that he committed a cognizable offence, the truth of the same should be ascertained in an inquiry or trial by the Criminal Court and till then the accused is presumed to be innocent. Applicant argues that pendency of a Criminal Case is no valid ground to hold that he is undesirable to hold the post of a Teacher.
Supreme Court of India Cites 31 - Cited by 14 - M Hidayatullah - Full Document
1