Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.33 seconds)Section 3 in The Prevention Of Damage To Public Property Act, 1984 [Entire Act]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
State Of Rajasthan, Jaipur vs Balchand @ Baliay on 20 September, 1977
In State of Rajasthan Jaipur Vs. Balchand AIR 1977 S.C. 2447. The
Hon‟ble Apex Court has held, "basic rule may perhaps be tersely put as
2026:JKLHC-JMU:1066
19 Bail App Nos. 316 & 320/2025
bail not jail, except where there are circumstances of fleeing from justice or
thwarting the course of justice or creating other troubles in the shape of
repeating offences or intimidating the witnesses and the like, by the
petitioner who seeks enlargement on bail from the court.
Sanjay Chandra vs Cbi on 23 November, 2011
20. It has been laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sanjay Chandra
vs. Central Bureau of Investigation AIR 20012 SC830 at Para 14 of its
Judgment as under:-
Dataram Singh vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 6 February, 2018
21. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Dataram Singh vs State of UP and Anr.
2018 3 SCC 22, has held that even if grant or refusal of bail is entirely the
discretion of a Judge, such discretion must be exercised in a judicious
manner and in a humane way observing as follows:-
Pankaj Jain vs Union Of India on 23 February, 2018
In Pankaj Jain vs Union of India and Anr. 2018 5 SCC 743, the Hon'ble
Supreme Court has held that the grant of bail has to be exercised
compassionately. Heinousness of crime by itself cannot be the ground to
out rightly deny the benefit of bail if there are other overwhelming
circumstances justifying grant of bail.
Article 22 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 436 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1