Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.46 seconds)

Pendekanti Subbarayudu vs Bysani Venkatanarasayya And Ors. on 14 June, 1966

The same view has been expressed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in the decision reported in AIR 1968 Andh Pra 61 (Subbarayudu v. Venkatanarassayya). Mr. Dasgupta contended that in the light of the later Division Bench decision of the Patna High Court reported in AIR 1962 Pat. 478, the position requires reconsideration. The view taken in AIR 1938 Pat. 529 has been dissented from in the decision reported in AIR 1962 Pat. 478 mainly relying on certain observations of Bowen, L. J. at page 457 in the decision reported in (1883) 11 QBD 440. The observations by Bowen. L. J. in the same decision occurring at page 462 and other Division Bench decisions of the Patna High Court have not been noticed in the decision reported in AIR 1962 Pat 478. The following observation by Bowen, L. J. at page 462 in the decision reported in (1883) 11 QBD 440 to a certain extent qualifies the broad proposition of law expressed at page 457 and followed in AIR 1962 Pat. 478.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1