Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.24 seconds)Section 8 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
Section 53 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 111 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
M/S Bhagwati Prasad Pawan Kumar vs Union Of India on 25 May, 2006
7. It is pointed out that the plaintiff by his conduct .i.e. by the
encashment of the cheque signified his acceptance to the
RSA No. 15/2007 Page 4 of 15
proposal contained in the letter dated 03.11.2003. Reliance is
placed upon the judgment reported in (2006) 5 SCC 311
Bhagwati Prasad Pawan Kumar Vs. Union of India to
substantiate this submission. It is pointed out that in this case
also where the appellant has accepted the cheque of the
respondent and encashed it, it amounted to an acceptance of the
offer made by the respondent and in terms of Section 8, he could
not take a different stand. It is further pointed out that on this
date i.e. on the date when this letter was sent i.e. on 03.11.2003,
there was no lis pending between the parties. The suit of the
plaintiff had been decreed on 02.08.2003; an application under
section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred
to as `CPC‟) for correction in the judgment had been filed only
on 07.01.2004.
Section 53A in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 152 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Sheth Maneklal Mansukhbhai vs Messrs. Hormusji Jamshedji ... on 21 March, 1950
13. The proposition as laid down in Manekla Mansukhbhai
(supra) is not in dispute. The doctrine of part performance in
view of the unamended provisions of Section 53 (A) is available
RSA No. 15/2007 Page 8 of 15
even in the case of an unregistered document i.e. an
unregistered agreement of lease.