Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 30 (0.35 seconds)

M/S. Innoventive Industries Ltd vs Icici Bank & Anr on 15 May, 2017

It is pertinent to take judicial notice of an order dated September 11, 2017 passed in G.A. 2791 of 2017 wherein the 18 decision in case of M/s Innovative Industries Ltd. Vs. ICICI Bank & Anr. reported in AIR 2017 SC 1025 has been relied upon which held that the moment initiation of the corporate insolvency resolution process takes place a moratorium is announced by the adjudicating authority vide Sections 13 and 14 of the Code by which institution of suit and pending proceeding etc. cannot be proceeded with. This continues until the approval of a resolution plan under Section 31 of the said Code.
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 79 - Cited by 132 - Full Document

Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani & Anr vs Indusind Bank Ltd. & Ors on 6 December, 2004

Lastly, Mr. Basu submitted that the suit is not maintainable as the suit has been filed by a person who is not authorised under law to deposed and invites my attention to answer to question 129 of Arun Kumar Sharma who has deposed on behalf of the plaintiff company as the constitution power of attorney holder and he has signed the plaint. It is pointed out that admittedly Mr. Sharma has been working in the Sister concern for the last thirty years as Manager and so he is not competent to institute suit on behalf of the plaintiff. Mr Basu has referred to a decision in case of Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani And Another Vs. Indusind Bank Ltd And Others reported in (2005) 2 Supreme Court Cases 217 wherein it has been observed thus--
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 1219 - H K Sema - Full Document
1   2 3 Next