Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.36 seconds)The Electricity Act, 2003
Section 66C in The Information Technology Act, 2000 [Entire Act]
Section 24 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 25 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 66 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 125 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Information Technology Act, 2000
Rajnesh vs Neha on 4 November, 2020
9. The relationship of the petitioner with the
respondent No.2 is not in dispute. It is also not in dispute that
the petitioner has initiated proceedings against the respondent
No.2 claiming maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. before
the Court at Ghaziabad. It is a matter of record that the
Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of RAJNESH VS. NEHA AND
ANOTHER reported in 2021(2) SCC 324 had directed that
parties to a proceeding for maintenance, should furnish their
-7-
CRL.P No. 9710 of 2017
assets and liabilities in the form of an affidavit. Therefore, it
was incumbent for the petitioner and respondent No.2 to
furnish the details of their assets and liabilities including their
source of income etc. The petitioner secured the details of the
respondent No.2 by creating a fake user ID and a fake
password and also a fake e-mail ID. She had furnished her own
mobile number to fill in the particulars to request the details of
Form-26AS of the respondent No.2. No doubt, the petitioner
has done so in a desperate attempt to secure the details of the
respondent No.2. However, the respondent No.2 was not
"induced" by the petitioner to furnish the details and she did
not cause any wrongful gain or wrongful loss to the respondent
No.2. Therefore, no offence under Section 415 or 417 of IPC
was committed. Even otherwise, as rightly contended by the
learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has not
"dishonestly" or "fraudulently" secured the details, but it for a
legitimate purpose that is to produce it before the Court at
Ghaziabad. Section 66C and 66D of the Act, 2000 provides that
the words "dishonestly" and "fraudulently" found in Section 66C
and 66D of the Act, 2000 shall have the same meaning as
-8-
CRL.P No. 9710 of 2017
defined under Section 24 and 25 of IPC, which are extracted
below: