Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.44 seconds)

Park View Enterprises vs State Government Of Tamil Nadu on 18 October, 1989

7.With regard to Para 12 of the affidavit, I submit that the Judgment of this Hon'ble Court in Park View Enterprises Vs. State of Tamil Nadu has no relevance to the case of the Petitioner. The said Judgment deal with whether Page No.19/58 http://www.judis.nic.in WP Nos.29304, 29373 and 29374 of 2019 the Insertion of Article 5(i) under Tamil Nadu Act 38 of 1987 ultra vires and the circular issued by the Inspector General of Registration dated
Madras High Court Cites 155 - Cited by 36 - Full Document

P.T. Rajan vs T.P.M. Sahir And Ors on 26 September, 2003

● This is a case which involves a huge revenue loss for the Government due to shortage in Collection of Stamp Duty and Registration Fees and the 3rd respondent is vested with the powers under Section 47-A of the Act, to initiate proceedings and pass orders wherever it is found that the interests of revenue is affected. The five years prescribed under the provision does not bar the 3rd respondent to exercise the power and the proceedings cannot be held to be without jurisdiction. To substantiate this submission, the learned Additional Advocate General, relied upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in P.T.Rajan v. T.P.M. Sahir and Others reported in [2003 8 SCC 498].
Supreme Court of India Cites 41 - Cited by 132 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1   2 Next