Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.63 seconds)

Aspi Jal And Anr vs Khushroo Rustom Dadyburjor on 5 April, 2013

In view of the above discussion, the provisions of Section 10 of the Code and the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court as afore-noted, I have no difficulty to hold that the previously instituted two suits by the defendant-revisionist being O.S. No.625 of 2016 and O.S. No.640 of 2016 and the SCC case filed by the plaintiff-respondent/ landlady being SCC No.8 of 2017, are not in respect of the same cause of action, same subject matter and the same relief. Therefore, the court below has not committed any error of law to reject the Application 37ga by the impugned order dated 25.11.2017. The revision has no merit and, therefore, deserves to be dismissed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 115 - Full Document

Ramji Gupta & Anr vs Gopi Krishan Agrawal (D) & Ors on 11 April, 2013

In the case of Ramji Gupta vs. Gopi Krishan Agrawal [(2013) 9 SCC 438] (Paras-16 to 18), Hon'ble Supreme Court held that the Small Causes Court has no right to adjudicate upon the title of the property. A question of title could also be decided upon incidentally, and that any finding recorded by a Judge, Small Causes Court in this behalf, could not operate as res judicata in a suit based on title. The procedure adopted in the trial of a case before the Small Causes Court is summary in nature.
Supreme Court of India Cites 48 - Cited by 50 - B S Chauhan - Full Document
1   2 Next